Two ways to approach low-risk investments

When considering safe investment options, two popular choices that often come to mind are FDIC-insured CDs (Certificates of Deposit) and US Treasuries. While both offer relatively low-risk investment opportunities, there are some critical differences between the two that investors should be aware of.

FDIC-insured CDs are certificates issued by banks and credit unions that offer a guaranteed rate of return for a specified period. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insures CDs up to $250,000 per depositor per bank, protecting against bank failure. In contrast, US Treasuries are debt securities issued by the US government to finance its operations. They are generally considered one of the safest investments available because the full faith and credit of the US government back them.

One key difference between the two is their liquidity. CDs have fixed terms ranging from a few months to several years, and if you need to withdraw funds before the maturity date, you may be subject to penalties. On the other hand, US Treasuries can be bought and sold in the secondary market and can be liquidated easily, making them a more flexible option.

Another difference is the level of risk. While both investments are considered safe, FDIC-insured CDs carry some risk due to the possibility of bank failure. While the FDIC provides insurance protection, there is always a small chance that a bank may fail, and investors may not receive their full investment amount. On the other hand, US Treasuries are backed by the US government and are considered virtually risk-free.

When it comes to returns, FDIC-insured CDs offer fixed interest rates that are lower than the returns available through US Treasuries. US Treasuries offer a range of maturities and yields determined by market demand, with longer-term securities offering higher yields.

In terms of taxes, both FDIC-insured CDs and US Treasuries are subject to federal income tax, but US Treasuries are exempt from state and local taxes. Additionally, you may be subject to capital gains tax if you sell US Treasuries for more than their purchase price.

Risks of Return on Investment: CDs

It's important to note that the FDIC receives no funding from taxpayers. Instead, it is funded by insurance premiums paid by banks and thrift institutions participating in the program. These premiums are based on the number of insured deposits each institution holds and the risk they pose to the insurance fund. In case of bank failure, the FDIC uses these funds to reimburse depositors for their insured deposits up to the $250,000 limit. This funding system helps ensure the banking system's stability and integrity while protecting depositors from loss.

While the FDIC insurance pool can become insolvent, it is highly unlikely. The FDIC has many safeguards to prevent insolvency, and its record of accomplishment in managing bank failures has been quite successful.

Firstly, as mentioned earlier, the FDIC collects insurance premiums from participating banks and thrift institutions. These premiums are based on the number of insured deposits each institution holds and the risk they pose to the insurance fund. The FDIC also has the authority to increase premiums to maintain the insurance fund's solvency.

Secondly, the FDIC has the ability to sell the assets and liabilities of a failed bank to another institution, thereby minimizing the cost of the failure of the insurance fund. This process, known as a purchase and assumption transaction, allows the acquiring institution to take over the failed bank’s deposits and assume its liabilities. At the same time, the FDIC pays out the insured deposits.

Finally, if the insurance fund were to become insolvent, the FDIC would have access to a line of credit with the US Treasury to cover any losses. The FDIC can also assess additional premiums on insured institutions to replenish the insurance fund.

It is worth noting that while the FDIC has never become insolvent since its creation in 1933, it has come close to doing so during times of economic stress, such as the savings and loan crisis in the 1980s. However, the FDIC's ability to manage these crises effectively and prevent widespread bank failures has helped to maintain public confidence in the banking system and the FDIC insurance program.

Risk of Return on Investment: Treasuries

If the United States were to become insolvent, it could have profound implications for US Treasuries, as the full faith and credit of the US government backs them. The creditworthiness of the US government is a key factor in determining the value of US Treasuries. Default or insolvency could significantly decrease demand for US Treasuries, resulting in a sharp rise in interest rates.

In addition, if the US were to become insolvent, it could lead to a global financial crisis, as domestic and foreign investors widely hold US Treasuries. A default could lead to a loss of confidence in the US government's ability to manage its finances, which could cause investors to sell off their US Treasury holdings, leading to a domino effect throughout the financial system.

However, it is important to note that the likelihood of the US becoming insolvent is extremely low because the US dollar is the world's reserve currency, and the US government can print its currency. This gives the government greater flexibility to manage its debt than other countries.

Furthermore, the US has a long history of managing its debt and has never defaulted on its sovereign debt. Even during times of economic stress, such as the Great Recession of 2008, the US government has been able to maintain its creditworthiness and continue to issue debt.

Overall, while there are risks associated with US Treasuries in the event of a US government insolvency, the likelihood of this scenario occurring is considered low. US Treasuries are still widely regarded as one of the safest investments in the world.

Implications of Printing Currency: A Double-edged Sword

The implications of the US printing more currency are complex and depend on a range of factors, including the current state of the economy, inflation rates, and global economic conditions.

On the one hand, increasing the money supply can help stimulate economic growth by making more money available for borrowing and spending. This can lead to increased investment and consumption, driving economic activity and creating jobs.

However, printing too much money can also lead to inflation, as the increased money supply can cause prices to rise. Inflation can erode the currency’s purchasing power and decrease consumer confidence and economic stability.

Furthermore, printing more currency can also lead to a depreciation of the currency's value relative to other currencies. This can negatively affect international trade, as a weaker currency can make imports more expensive and exports cheaper, potentially leading to a trade deficit.

Overall, the decision to print more currency should be carefully considered, considering a range of economic factors. While increasing the money supply can help stimulate economic growth, it is essential to strike a balance between promoting growth and maintaining economic stability and confidence in the currency.

What’s Your Timetable?

In conclusion, both FDIC-insured CDs and US Treasuries offer low-risk investment opportunities, but there are some key differences between the two that investors should consider. While CDs offer fixed returns and are insured by the FDIC, they are less liquid and carry some risk due to the possibility of bank failure. US Treasuries, on the other hand, offer higher returns, are virtually risk-free, and are more liquid. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on an investor's financial goals, risk tolerance, and investment horizon.

Authors Note: This article was written using prompts in ChatGPT. (2023, May 8). The author has independently verified the accuracy of the responses. The author edited and formatted responses from the prompts for clarity.

---

---

Related Articles

There has been a lot of news on high inflation coming and its looming effects on everything from investment portfolios to the price of milk.

As people are searching for ways to combat high inflation and preserve how far their money can go, we’ve been receiving many questions on an investment option called I Bonds. Questions about what they are and why they haven’t heard of them before.

Our hope is to shed some light on Series I Savings Bonds (I Bonds), available here, and outline how the investment works before offering our recommendations.

How risky is an I Bond?

I Bonds are US treasury bonds, meaning they are backed by the full faith and credit of the US government, making them one of the safest, lowest risk investments possible.

What is the interest rate on an I Bond?

There are two parts to the interest rate on an I Bond.

• A nominal (fixed) rate — currently 0% as of November 2, 2021.

• An inflation (floating or adjustable) rate that changes every 6 months — currently 3.56% as of November 1, 2021.

These two rates are added together to determine the interest rate on an I Bond, so the current rate on the I Bonds for 6 months is 0% (nominal) + 3.56% (inflation) = 3.56% total (which is 7.12% annually). This interest rate cannot drop below 0% even if there is ever a negative inflation adjustment. See here for historical I Bond interest rates.

The floating rate on I Bonds will adjust as inflation adjusts. Today, inflation rates are high, but as the historical rates table in the link above shows, inflation rates can be lower.

When can I access my money?

An important factor to consider is that I Bonds only pay interest upon maturity, so you will not receive cash flows from the I Bond as you hold it.

I bonds have no secondary market, so you cannot resell your I Bond, you can only redeem it. I Bonds have no liquidity for the first year after purchase, so it’s important that you will not need to access the funds for at least one year. For years 1-5 after purchase, you may redeem your I Bond early by forfeiting the last 3 months of interest. After 5 years, you may redeem the bond early without penalty. I Bonds will mature 30 years after purchase.

How do the taxes work?

I Bonds only pay interest upon maturity. You can claim (pay) the taxes on the earned interest every year on your I Bonds, or you can pay taxes on all interest upon maturity of the I Bond. I Bond interest is not subject to state or local taxes. See here for more information.

How do I purchase I Bonds?

You have to purchase I Bonds directly through treasurydirect.gov, or with your federal income tax refund. See here for more information.

You are limited to $10,000 of I Bonds through electronic purchase, and $5,000 of I Bonds through paper purchase via your tax refund, for a total limit of $15,000 of I Bonds in a calendar year.

The pros and cons of waiting to get paid out

If you’re still wondering if these bonds are right for you and your financial plan, weigh the pros and cons below against your goals.

Pros:

• The inflation adjustment makes I Bonds a great inflation hedge

Cons:

• Interest is only paid out upon maturity, so don’t utilize I Bonds as a source of cash flows over time

• Funds are locked up for 1 year, so don’t use I Bonds for any funds you might need before then

Other considerations:

• I Bonds must be purchased on your own, so they’re for a more DIY inclined investor

• The inflation adjustment rate will change adjust over time, so the precise amount of interest an I Bond will earn is uncertain

• Consider the potential taxes of having all interest hitting upon maturity of the I Bond, or having to pay taxes each year on interest you have not yet received

• You are limited on how much you can purchase in a year

I Bonds are typically best for medium term (i.e. around 5 year) savings goals.

The inflation adjustment reduces your risk of losing purchasing power due to inflation. The low nominal rates on I Bonds today means your funds will not grow faster than inflation.

For longer term savings goals (i.e. retirement in 10+ years), equities are a great long-term inflation hedge, because companies can adjust their prices (and therefore dividends & earnings) based on inflation. Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) are another, lower risk than equities, investment that adjust for inflation.

If you have more questions about I Bonds, or would like to speak to a financial professional about other investments, please reach out to us at hi@humaninvesting.com or 503-905-3100.

---

---

Related Articles

We talk to a lot of different people about investing. A common request is something along the lines of: “I don’t want to lose anything, and I want my money to grow.” This is a challenging, if not impossible mission. The investment world is full of opportunities to grow your money. However, there is an inherent risk when you put your money in any investment.

Finance has a lot of ways of measuring risk. Standard deviation is used to try to show a range of the possible returns. Max drawdown displays your worst-case scenario. Sharpe ratio provides a risk-adjusted measure of performance. However, very few investors ask about standard deviation, max drawdown, and Sharpe ratios. The people we talk to are most likely to ask “What are the odds of losing money” because they don’t want to see their current savings drop in value.

How strong is your purchasing power?

An important consideration when talking about losing money is purchasing power: the ability to buy goods with your money. Inflation has consistently pushed prices up over time, reducing the purchasing power of a single dollar. Wanting to avoid losing money is completely understandable. The danger of keeping your money under your mattress or sitting in cash is that inflation is constantly reducing your purchasing power.

When concerned with losing money, many investors are focused on nominal returns. Nominal returns are the raw return values, unadjusted for inflation, and are simple to calculate and digest. I would argue that most investors should be focused on real returns: returns adjusted for inflation. Real returns are a more accurate measure of your change in purchasing power. Ultimately, very few outside of Scrooge McDuck want a giant pile of money. Most people want to spend that money on goods, like food, travel, or a home, therefore purchasing power is likely what investors really care about.

Real return = (1+Nominal Return) ÷ (1+inflation rate)

Historically, stocks deliver positive returns, and those returns are in your favor. However, stocks are down (i.e. lose money) more frequently than bonds. The safety bonds offer also means they provide lower returns. What blend of stocks and bonds is most likely to protect your purchasing power (i.e. produce a positive real return)?

inflation is dwindling BOND power

To try and answer this question, I looked at the Stocks, Bonds, Bills, and Inflation (SBBI) data from the CFA Institute from 1926-2020. This data included monthly and annual returns; the annual data is for each calendar year. For stocks, I used the Ibbotson SBBI US Large-Cap Stocks total return.

For Bonds, I used the Ibbotson US intermediate-term (5 year) Government Bonds total return. I looked at several different portfolios which include a variety of stocks and bonds. Specifically, I blended the stocks and bonds in 10% increments, from 100% stocks, to 90% stocks 10% bonds, to 80% stocks 20% bonds, and so on to 0% stocks 100% bonds. I also assumed the portfolios were rebalanced at the start of each return period (i.e. the weights were reset at the start of each month for monthly data, and the start of each calendar year for annual data).

I took these different stock/bond portfolio mixes, and I calculated the nominal and real returns from 1926-2020 for both monthly and annual (calendar year) returns. I then calculated what percentage of returns were positive to measure the chance of losing money (nominal returns) or purchasing power (real returns). I’ve graphed the nominal vs real returns for monthly and annual returns below.

You’ll notice the nominal monthly returns paint a clear picture. If you want positive nominal returns more often, you want to own more bonds, hence the steady upward trend to the graph. If you look at the annual nominal returns and want to maximize your chances of a positive nominal return, you actually want a 10/90 portfolio (10% stocks, 90% bonds). As risky as stocks seem, having at least a sliver of stocks actually increases the chances of a positive nominal return

The real returns tell a slightly different story. For the monthly real returns, the stock/bond mix is almost irrelevant for producing a positive return, and hovers right around 60%. There is a drop off after 10/90 (10% stocks, 90% bonds), indicating owning even just 10% stocks in your portfolio helps increase your chances of positive real returns better than owning 100% bonds.

For the annual real returns, you can see that your odds of a positive real return are better with at least some bonds in the portfolio. Interestingly, the 70/30 portfolio and the 20/80 portfolios produce the highest chance of a positive real return. The all bond portfolio, 0/100, has the worst chance of maintaining your purchasing power (i.e. producing a positive real return).

Stocks can seem risky, and the loss of value can make many investors shy away. Even just a small amount of stocks can protect your purchasing power better than owning only bonds. There are still many considerations for how you should invest including your risk tolerance, time horizon, and holistic financial plan. If you’re interested in talking to an advisor, please reach out to us at hi@humaninvesting.com or 503-905-3100.

---

---

Related articles

The financial world can be a confusing place filled with jargon, technicalities, and little to no guarantees. Research suggests that those who are financially literate tend to have better financial outcomes. Financially literacy is typically measured by asking some core financial concept questions. Let’s walk through some financial literacy questions from the National Financial Capability Study, and explain the why behind the answer. Feel free to guess and score yourself at the end:

Question 1 - interest:

Suppose you had $100 in a savings account and the interest rate was 2% per year. After 5 years, how much do you think you would have in the account if you left the money to grow?

A. Less than $102
B. Exactly $102
C. More than $102

Answer: C, more than $102.

Explanation: The key part here is “After 5 years”. We are told the interest rate is 2% per year. That means every year, 2% gets added to our principal balance. To break it down year by year:

The interest earned increases each year. This is due to compound interest: the original principal ($100) grows, and the interest you earned previously (in year 2, $2) both earn interest. At the end of 5 years, we have $110.41 which is C More than $102.

Why this matters: Interest affects you when you save money to grow it, or borrow money to pay it back later. Knowing how interest can work for or against you is critical for financial success.

Question 2 - inflation:

Imagine the interest rate on your savings account was 1% per year and inflation was 2% per year. After 1 year, how much would you be able to buy with the money in this account?

A. Less than today
B. Exactly the same
C. More than today

Answer: A, Less Than today.

Explanation: They key here is the inflation rate is higher than the savings rate. Inflation is growing at 2%, meaning the price of goods (rent, utilities, food, cars, etc.) is going up by 2% each year. The cost of $100 of goods today will be $102 in 1 year. Your interest on savings is growing at 1% a year. That means in 1 year you will have $101 to spend on goods. In 1 year, you will have $101 to buy $102 worth of goods. Your ability to buy is A less than today.

Why this matters: Even if you keep your money “safe” in the bank or under the mattress, inflation is going to make that money less and less valuable. Thus why investing is so important. Investing can be scary due to downturns in the market, but ultimately the odds are in your favor to grow your money over time. Unless you can save significant portions of your income, growing your savings faster than inflation is critical for being able to retire.

Question 3 - Risk Diversification:

Buying a single company’s stock usually provides a safer return than a stock mutual fund.

A. True
B. False

Answer: B, False.

Explanation: To answer this question correctly, it is important to understand both risk and that a mutual fund owns a variety of companies. They keyword here is safer. Financial markets have two types of risk: market risk and company-specific risk (aka systematic risk and nonsystematic risk respectively).

Market risk refers to risk all companies face. Examples of market risk include a change to the US tax code, a global pandemic, or shifts in consumer tastes like a shift from fast food to organic freshly prepared food. You will always face market risk because every company is exposed to these risks. Company-specific risk refers to risks unique to one company. Examples of company-specific risk include sudden changes in management, a press release about product defects, mass recalls, or a superior/cheaper product released by a rival company. Because you own a variety of companies in a stock mutual fund, you diversify away (i.e. reduce your risk) if any single, specific company has a terrible event.

Why this matters: Don’t invest all your money in one company. Especially if you work for that company, and your compensation is based on the company doing well. By spreading out your investments, you reduce your risk of catastrophic returns, and smooth out the ride so you can sleep at night.

Question 4 - interest of the life of a loan:

A 15-year mortgage typically requires higher monthly payments than a 30-year mortgage, but the interest paid over the life of the loan will be less

A. True
B. False

Answer: A, True.

Explanation: Because of the shorter life of the mortgage loan, you pay less interest. Remember in question 1, interest compounds every year. When you borrow money, that compounding works against you. Therefore, the faster you are paying off debt, the less time for interest to compound and grow the total amount you have to payoff. The monthly payments are typically larger, but the overall interest paid is less.

To illustrate with numbers, let’s look at the difference between a 15 year & 30 year mortgage, assuming a 5% interest rate for both:

Why this matters: You can see from the example how much money is saved by opting for a 15 year mortgage. Can you afford that extra monthly payment? That’s worth investigating, but you’ll never explore your choices if you don’t know what they are. You can also usually get a lower interest rate for shorter term debts, which saves you even more money. Anytime you borrow any amount of money, the faster you can pay it off, the less you will pay total. Even if you don’t get a lower rate on the debt, if you pay off the principal sooner, that means there’s less interest compounding against you. When looking to borrow money, evaluate what term (length of time) works best for you and your budget. You want to minimize your cost of borrowing, but you also want to give yourself enough flexibility that you’re confident you will make all those payments on time, regardless of what life brings.

Question 5 - Bond prices and interest:

If interest rates rise, what will typically happen to bond prices?

A. They will fall
B. They will stay the same
C. They will rise

Answer: A, they will fall.

Explanation: This is the question most people get wrong. A bond is government or corporate debt. The government or company pays you coupons (interest payments) based on the issued interest rate. At the end of the bond’s life, it matures, and you get the principal back.

Imagine Disney issues bonds paying 5% interest, the current market rate. You purchase a bond for $1,000, and you get a $50 coupon payment from Mickey Mouse every year until the bond matures. If interest rates rise next year (say to 8%), and Disney issues new bonds, they will issue them at the new interest rate. Your neighbor Laura decides to buy $1,000, and she gets an $80 coupon from Mickey Mouse every year. Because interest rates rose, the value of your bond paying $50/month goes down in value, less than $1,000, because the $1,000 could buy Laura’s bond paying $80/month. The reverse if also true. If rates had fallen to 3%, Laura’s bond would only pay her $30, and your $50/month bond would be worth more than $1,000.

Why this matters: Interest rates change over time. This causes bond prices to change. Bonds will still be less volatile than equities, but they do also fluctuate in value. Don’t panic when you see interest rates rise, and your bond prices going down in value. This is both normal and expected. Rising interest rates are also usually a healthy sign for the economy, and so your equities will generally be rising in value to help offset the loss in value of your bonds. The reverse is also true here. Falling interest rates tend to indicate a less healthy economy (think about when rates have dropped significantly & quickly; the 07-08 financial crisis and COVID-19) which means falling stock prices. Because they don’t tend to move together (uncorrelated), bonds and stocks are an excellent pair for smoothing out your investment returns.

How did you do?

If you got some questions wrong, I hope you understand the why behind the answers and how to utilize this knowledge to better your financial life. If you have questions about financial vocabulary or systems you’d like me to blog about, please email me at andrewg@humaninvesting.com. If want to talk to an advisor, please email us at hi@humaninvesting.com.

---

---

Related Articles