Posts in Managing your Portfolio
2024 Q3 Economic Update: Equity Risk Premiums
 
 
 

We’re all familiar with the risk-reward tradeoff: Do I risk injury to compete in a sport I love and feel fulfilled by? Do I risk leaving a stable job to pursue a career that excites me? It’s not surprising that this everyday phenomenon is also very present in our investment portfolios.

For example, there are three asset classes that an investor typically includes in their portfolio: cash, bonds, and stocks. Of the three, stocks can generate the greatest return but also merit the highest risk. On the other hand, a risk-free investment guarantees a future return with essentially no possibility of loss. An example of a risk-free investment is US Treasury bills, as they are backed by the full faith and credit of the US government. If investors are taking on more risk by investing in stocks, they want to know their efforts are worth it. Enter the equity risk premium.

Understanding the Equity Risk Premium

The equity risk premium measures how much more an investor may receive in returns when investing in stocks versus a risk-free investment like T-bills. Basically, it puts a number to the term, “the higher the risk, the higher the reward”.

As we’ve previously written, the fear of financial loss causes many investors to be overly cautious about their investments. ”Myopic loss aversion” is when focusing on avoiding short-term losses in equities leads to poor long-term allocation decisions.  Incorporating bonds into your investment portfolio can serve as  a stabilizer, reducing the payback period to see your portfolio recover from downturns. Many investors own some combination of stocks and bonds to ensure the risk-reward tradeoff is an acceptable range for them, either emotionally or financially (or both). Because of the fear of loss, many investors either avoid or under-weigh equities. How significant is the difference between owning stocks (highest risk), bonds (lower risk), or cash (no risk)?

Risks associated with investing in Stocks

So, why do those who invest in stocks generally receive a greater return? Because of the greater risk they take on by doing so, such as:

Unpredictability: Stocks do not offer fixed payments at specific intervals like bonds.

When an investor buys a bond, they are essentially lending money to a company or a government (see our Bonds 101 blog for a primer on bond basics). Like any loan, bonds have terms outlining specific payment amounts and dates. These payments, known as coupons or interest, are obligatory, with insolvency being the only reason for non-payment.

Conversely, stocks represent ownership in a company and entail greater uncertainty. Returns for stock investors can come in the form of dividends distributed by the company or by selling shares at a higher price in the future. Unlike bond payments, dividends are not mandatory and can be suspended unexpectedly, as seen during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, the growth of dividends may not meet expectations, even for well-established companies commonly known as “blue chip” stocks (such as Coca-Cola, McDonalds, or Microsoft). Even large and stable companies face challenges that can cause fluctuations in their stock prices. Due to the unpredictability of stock payouts in terms of amount and timing, investing in stocks is inherently riskier and more volatile. As a result, investors demand higher returns from equities as compensation for bearing this additional risk.

Risk of Total Loss: Stockholders can see their investment go to zero more easily than bond investors.

Over the last thirty years, bondholders have frequently recouped 40% or more of their initial investment during bankruptcies, although exact recovery rates can vary[1]. In contrast, equity owners seldom receive any compensation in bankruptcy. The harsh reality is that most companies fail in the long term, and many of these companies made interest payments on bonds throughout their existence, while equity investors ultimately see their investments become worthless. Regardless of whether you’re investing in stocks or bonds, owning a broad index fund provides essential diversification. Owning a basket of companies ensures that even if one fails, the other companies that continue to grow offset your losses so you’re never experiencing a complete wipeout.

The Equity Premium at Play Can Sometimes be a Jackpot

First, a quick note: All return figures mentioned below are based on real returns, or returns after adjusting for inflation. Real returns are the most accurate comparison across different asset classes, reflecting changes in purchasing power over time. Although nominal returns are widely used in the financial world unless otherwise specified, they do not account for inflation and are therefore less accurate in this example. All returns are based on rolling 12-month periods, meaning this is the return if you held the investment for 12 months.

Table 1 - Real returns, rolling 12 month periods - (1926-2023, adjusted for inflation)[2]

When we look at the real returns for the last 97 years between cash, bonds, and equities, it’s clear stocks deliver the highest returns, albeit with the most downside risk. Cash is undeniably the safest asset class but struggles to outpace inflation. Bonds tend to be closer to cash than equities in terms of their risk-return profile.

The Long-Term Power of the Equity Premium for an Investor

While stocks undoubtedly offer the highest returns, it’s essential to grasp their long-term value to investors. To demonstrate this, let’s outline a hypothetical scenario:

  • Assume three investors each save $5K annually for 40 years for retirement for a total contribution of $200K per investor.

  • We’ll assume each investor owns only a single asset class (cash, bonds, or stocks) for all 40 years of saving.

  • We’ll use the real return averages from Table 1 for each asset class.

  • We’ll utilize the commonly cited 4% annual withdrawal rate[3] for retirees to determine how much income the portfolio provides in retirement annually.

Table 2 – Portfolio values assuming real returns

The difference in portfolio value, and resulting income possible in retirement, is significant. A pure equity investor ends up with nearly six times the spending power of a pure bond investor after 40 years.

While equity market volatility can be unsettling, exposure to equities can significantly reduce the amount of savings required to achieve your financial goals such as funding retirement. It’s critical to ensure your equity allocation is sufficient to facilitate asset growth yet small enough to prevent panic during market downturns. Striking this balance depends on your emotional risk tolerance and financial capacity for risk.

Determining the optimal equity and bond allocation requires careful consideration of factors such as taxes, time horizon, and liquidity needs. If you are seeking guidance in navigating this complex process, please reach out to us at 503-905-3100, or email hi@humaninvesting.com to start the conversation.

Sources

[1] https://www.spglobal.com/ratings/en/research/articles/231215-default-transition-and-recovery-u-s-recovery-study-loan-recoveries-persist-below-their-trend-12947167

[2] These returns are based on an index, do not represent actual investment results, and are not guarantees of future results.

Data based on rolling 12 month returns, with monthly return intervals.

Equity returns utilize the Ibbotson SBBI Large-Cap Stocks Total Return for Jan 1926 to Sep 1989 (data courtesy of CFA Institute), and S&P 500 TR for Oct 1989 to Dec 2023 (data courtesy of YCharts).

Bond returns utilize the Ibbotson SBBI US Intermediate Term Government Bonds Total Return for Jan 1926 to Apr 1996 (CFA Institute), and Bloomberg US Aggregate for May 1996 to Dec 2023 (YCharts).

Cash returns utilize the Ibbotson SBBI US (30-Day) Treasury Bills for Jan 1926 to May 1997 (CFA Institute), and Bloomberg US Treasury Bills 1-3 Month for Jun 1997 to Dec 2023 (YCharts).

Inflation rates for calculating real returns are based on the Ibbotson SBBI inflation for Jan 1926 to Jan 1947 (CFA Institute), and the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for Feb 1947 to Dec 2023 (YCharts).

[3] https://www.financialplanningassociation.org/sites/default/files/2021-04/MAR04%20Determining%20Withdrawal%20Rates%20Using%20Historical%20Data.pdf

 
 

 

Related Articles

Should I Invest in US Treasuries or CDs From My Bank or Credit Union? What are the differences?
 
 
 

Two ways to approach low-risk investments

When considering safe investment options, two popular choices that often come to mind are FDIC-insured CDs (Certificates of Deposit) and US Treasuries. While both offer relatively low-risk investment opportunities, there are some critical differences between the two that investors should be aware of.

FDIC-insured CDs are certificates issued by banks and credit unions that offer a guaranteed rate of return for a specified period. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insures CDs up to $250,000 per depositor per bank, protecting against bank failure. In contrast, US Treasuries are debt securities issued by the US government to finance its operations. They are generally considered one of the safest investments available because the full faith and credit of the US government back them.

One key difference between the two is their liquidity. CDs have fixed terms ranging from a few months to several years, and if you need to withdraw funds before the maturity date, you may be subject to penalties. On the other hand, US Treasuries can be bought and sold in the secondary market and can be liquidated easily, making them a more flexible option.

Another difference is the level of risk. While both investments are considered safe, FDIC-insured CDs carry some risk due to the possibility of bank failure. While the FDIC provides insurance protection, there is always a small chance that a bank may fail, and investors may not receive their full investment amount. On the other hand, US Treasuries are backed by the US government and are considered virtually risk-free.

When it comes to returns, FDIC-insured CDs offer fixed interest rates that are lower than the returns available through US Treasuries. US Treasuries offer a range of maturities and yields determined by market demand, with longer-term securities offering higher yields.

In terms of taxes, both FDIC-insured CDs and US Treasuries are subject to federal income tax, but US Treasuries are exempt from state and local taxes. Additionally, you may be subject to capital gains tax if you sell US Treasuries for more than their purchase price.

Risks of Return on Investment: CDs

It's important to note that the FDIC receives no funding from taxpayers. Instead, it is funded by insurance premiums paid by banks and thrift institutions participating in the program. These premiums are based on the number of insured deposits each institution holds and the risk they pose to the insurance fund. In case of bank failure, the FDIC uses these funds to reimburse depositors for their insured deposits up to the $250,000 limit. This funding system helps ensure the banking system's stability and integrity while protecting depositors from loss.

While the FDIC insurance pool can become insolvent, it is highly unlikely. The FDIC has many safeguards to prevent insolvency, and its record of accomplishment in managing bank failures has been quite successful.

Firstly, as mentioned earlier, the FDIC collects insurance premiums from participating banks and thrift institutions. These premiums are based on the number of insured deposits each institution holds and the risk they pose to the insurance fund. The FDIC also has the authority to increase premiums to maintain the insurance fund's solvency.

Secondly, the FDIC has the ability to sell the assets and liabilities of a failed bank to another institution, thereby minimizing the cost of the failure of the insurance fund. This process, known as a purchase and assumption transaction, allows the acquiring institution to take over the failed bank’s deposits and assume its liabilities. At the same time, the FDIC pays out the insured deposits.

Finally, if the insurance fund were to become insolvent, the FDIC would have access to a line of credit with the US Treasury to cover any losses. The FDIC can also assess additional premiums on insured institutions to replenish the insurance fund.

It is worth noting that while the FDIC has never become insolvent since its creation in 1933, it has come close to doing so during times of economic stress, such as the savings and loan crisis in the 1980s. However, the FDIC's ability to manage these crises effectively and prevent widespread bank failures has helped to maintain public confidence in the banking system and the FDIC insurance program.

Risk of Return on Investment: Treasuries

If the United States were to become insolvent, it could have profound implications for US Treasuries, as the full faith and credit of the US government backs them. The creditworthiness of the US government is a key factor in determining the value of US Treasuries. Default or insolvency could significantly decrease demand for US Treasuries, resulting in a sharp rise in interest rates.

In addition, if the US were to become insolvent, it could lead to a global financial crisis, as domestic and foreign investors widely hold US Treasuries. A default could lead to a loss of confidence in the US government's ability to manage its finances, which could cause investors to sell off their US Treasury holdings, leading to a domino effect throughout the financial system.

However, it is important to note that the likelihood of the US becoming insolvent is extremely low because the US dollar is the world's reserve currency, and the US government can print its currency. This gives the government greater flexibility to manage its debt than other countries.

Furthermore, the US has a long history of managing its debt and has never defaulted on its sovereign debt. Even during times of economic stress, such as the Great Recession of 2008, the US government has been able to maintain its creditworthiness and continue to issue debt.

Overall, while there are risks associated with US Treasuries in the event of a US government insolvency, the likelihood of this scenario occurring is considered low. US Treasuries are still widely regarded as one of the safest investments in the world.

Implications of Printing Currency: A Double-edged Sword

The implications of the US printing more currency are complex and depend on a range of factors, including the current state of the economy, inflation rates, and global economic conditions.

On the one hand, increasing the money supply can help stimulate economic growth by making more money available for borrowing and spending. This can lead to increased investment and consumption, driving economic activity and creating jobs.

However, printing too much money can also lead to inflation, as the increased money supply can cause prices to rise. Inflation can erode the currency’s purchasing power and decrease consumer confidence and economic stability.

Furthermore, printing more currency can also lead to a depreciation of the currency's value relative to other currencies. This can negatively affect international trade, as a weaker currency can make imports more expensive and exports cheaper, potentially leading to a trade deficit.

Overall, the decision to print more currency should be carefully considered, considering a range of economic factors. While increasing the money supply can help stimulate economic growth, it is essential to strike a balance between promoting growth and maintaining economic stability and confidence in the currency.

What’s Your Timetable?

In conclusion, both FDIC-insured CDs and US Treasuries offer low-risk investment opportunities, but there are some key differences between the two that investors should consider. While CDs offer fixed returns and are insured by the FDIC, they are less liquid and carry some risk due to the possibility of bank failure. US Treasuries, on the other hand, offer higher returns, are virtually risk-free, and are more liquid. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on an investor's financial goals, risk tolerance, and investment horizon.

Authors Note: This article was written using prompts in ChatGPT. (2023, May 8). The author has independently verified the accuracy of the responses. The author edited and formatted responses from the prompts for clarity.

 
 

 

Related Articles

Payback Periods: How long to Make your Money Back?
 

As I write this in May 2022, most major asset classes are down for the year. Stocks, bonds, foreign or domestic, it’s hard to find an investment producing positive returns right now. Since no investor likes to see the balance in their account drop, we have received an uptick in client inquiries about whether it’s worth staying invested. The short answer is yes; we still recommend staying invested. Markets have historically recovered, and grown to new highs. Panicking and selling your investments when they’ve gone down in price is unhelpful for achieving your long-term investment goals. Staying invested when the markets are roiling is easy to say, hard to do.

If you’re interested in a longer, more data driven response about why you should stay invested, keep reading. A lot of client’s concerns boil down to “How long is it going to take for me to make my money back?”. Let’s call this amount of time it takes to hit a new all-time high for a portfolio the “payback period”.

For the returns, I pulled the Ibbotson SBBI US Large-Cap Stocks for equity, and the Ibbotson SBBI US Intermediate-term (5-year) Government Bonds for fixed income. This data compiles the monthly returns from January 1926 to March 2022. I took a 100% equity portfolio (100/0) and added 10% bonds to compare different allocations (i.e. 60/40 is 60% equity 40% fixed income). I assumed monthly rebalancing.

Source: CFA Institute

As the graph shows, the more conservative your allocation, the shorter the time-frame necessary to make your money back. The most aggressive allocations (100/0 and 90/10) can take about 15 years to make your money back. A more balanced investor (40/60 to 80/20) would expect around 7 years as the worst case to make their money back.

I want to emphasize these numbers reflect the absolute worst scenarios over nearly a century of investing. We could always see a new worst case. Typical experiences are usually not as extreme. Even just looking at the 2nd longest time-frame to make your money back, and the longest payback is just over 6 years.

 
 

Source: CFA Institute

In most cases, you will make money in a relatively short amount of time if you remain invested. The final graph shows how long your investment horizon needs to be to have made money 95% of the time. As you can see, a majority of the time markets reward investors who stay invested for at least 9 months. That 5% of times where you haven’t made money in 9 months, we have seen some major draw-downs that took years to recover from. Make sure you have positioned yourself in a way where you are comfortable with all possible outcomes.

Source: CFA Institute

So, what do we do with this information? Some perspective for us all:

Understand the Time-frame you’re Investing For

If you’re not accessing funds for 15+ years, you shouldn’t worry about how long it takes to make the money back.

  • If you are investing in a retirement account, keep doing that.

  • If you move money monthly into a brokerage account, keep doing that.

If you are planning on accessing the funds in 10 years or less, consider incorporating bonds in your allocation to reduce risk, and shorten the time frame to recover a loss in value for your portfolio.

If you’re currently accessing your funds, have a financial plan to understand how you handle downturns in the markets and still achieve your financial goals

  • Strategies for this include having a certain amount of cash on hand to cover market downturns, adjusting your budget as needed, etc.

Stay Invested

When you see your account balance down, know that remaining invested is the best way to recover lost value. Most of the time, you won’t have to wait for years to see your balance recover.

Plan in a way that Helps you Sleep at Night

If you can’t handle the thought of waiting seven years to make your money back, a 70/30 allocation may not be right for you. Have a financial plan in place that accounts for the worst-case scenarios, so you know you’ll be able to ride out any volatility in the markets.

Understand History can Only Tell us so Much

The markets could always find a new worst-case scenario. Use history as a guide for setting expectations, not absolute certainty of what is to come.


 
 
 

Related Articles

Do's and Dont's of a Bear Market
 

It can be agonizing to watch your portfolio decline during a down market. Our human nature is to react erratically, which can be destructive to your financial plan. While it is important to stay the course, that doesn't mean you need to be idle. There is always an opportunity to do something to better your financial house. Here are a few productive things you can do as an investor during a down market: 

Do: 

Take Advantage of Opportunity

Invest cash: Risk assets like stocks are discounted, and as such, now may be a timely opportunity to invest the cash you have on the sidelines. Yes, markets may go down further, so be prepared for additional short-term losses. When investing additional dollars, don't let a desire to time the market-bottom perfectly get in the way of taking advantage of the opportunity.

Look for opportunities to Tax-loss harvest: Tax-loss harvesting allows you to get a tax break for poor-performing investments in a brokerage account. This strategy allows a taxpayer to offset other taxable gains and potentially claim a deduction against ordinary income. This is an unseen benefit for investors who have a brokerage account and want to use poor-performing investments to lessen their tax burden. (See Tax Tips in a Down Market

Keep an Eye on your Financial Goals

Rebalance: Market moves can result in a drift of your account's investments. Rebalancing your investments to your desired investment strategy can restore the appropriate level of risk and return to your account. Making sure you have an appropriate amount in stocks will help you take advantage of the possible market rebound. 

Accelerate Savings: Are you systematically saving into an investment account, such as a 401(k), IRA, or brokerage account? Consider making a larger contribution now to take advantage of the opportunity. This is a similar thought process to investing cash. 

Roth IRA conversions: Stock market downturns make for an opportunity to convert traditional IRA dollars to a Roth. When you convert dollars to a Roth IRA, you are responsible to pay income tax on the conversion amount. You are trading the tax-deferred (pay taxes when you withdraw) growth for tax-free growth. Before you complete a Roth conversion make sure you understand the tax implications and talk to your advisor or tax professional. 

An example: Your IRA was valued at $10,000 and is now valued at $8,000 due to market loss. To convert your IRA to a Roth, you would pay income tax on $8,000 rather than the previous amount of $10,000. Any growth from the time of the conversion is now tax-free for qualified withdrawals.  

Stay Educated

Read a book - My favorite personal finance book is the Psychology of Money by Morgan Housel. Housel provides timeless lessons about personal finance, human behavior, and long-term investing. Give it a read and let us know what you think. 

Don’t:

Don't invest short-term cash: Strategic cash cushions do have a significant place in a financial plan. Now is a prudent time to assess your cash holdings. Never use short-term dollars to invest. 

Don't watch your account or market too closely. Staring at a screen during periods of market fluctuations can be poisonous to your emotional wellbeing. Log out, take a deep breath, and go for a walk.

Don’t panic sell - The key thing for many investors is not to panic, stick to your plan. Remember that market declines are normal. This is the price of admission for long-term returns. 

 What We’re Doing for our Clients

Our team at Human Investing continues to carry our methodical approach to help steward our clients’ dollars. Our investment analyst team is constantly looking for opportunities to tax-loss harvest and rebalance. All the while, our Investment Committee persists in our due diligence for opportunities to enhance our investment strategies. 

While it is important to stay the course, that does not mean you need to sit on your hands and do nothing. We hope to provide you with a list of constructive things you can do to better your financial plan. Please let our team of credentialed advisors know if there is anything we can do to help you navigate the current market.  

 
 

 
 
 

Related Articles

Investing 101: How Dividends Work
 

A dividend is when a publicly listed company pays out a portion of earnings to shareholders. These can be paid out in cash or given as additional stock. These are given out to reward investors for entrusting their money with the company.

Who Determines the Dividend?

The Board of Directors decides two things:

  1. If they are going to issue a dividend or invest the profits back into the company

  2. The amount of the dividend

So, how does the Board make these decisions?

Whether or not a company issues dividends to shareholders often depends on how long the company has been around. Companies like Coca-Cola who have been around for a long time have lower growth potential and tend to pay a higher dividend because they see it as the best return for shareholders. If the Board of Directors thinks investing their earnings back into the development of the business will provide a greater return long term, they are most likely going to forego paying out a dividend or increase an existing one.

Many companies, especially newer companies, do not issue dividends. They retain earnings to help with future business activities. See the example below.

Important Dates to Note

These four dates are important to know if you qualify for a dividend and when you will receive it for owning shares of a company.

  1. Announcement date or declaration date: This is when the Board of Directors announces its intention to pay out a dividend.

  2. Ex-Dividend date: The ex-dividend date is the trading date on which the dividend will not be owed to a new buyer of the stock, this is one business day before the record date.

    For example: If the stock has an ex-dividend date of June 26th you will only receive the dividend if you purchased the stock before the 26th of June. If you bought the stock on the ex-dividend date or after you will not receive the dividend this time around.

  3. Record Date: This is the day on which the company checks its records to identify shareholders of the company.

    Note: If you own shares of the company on its record date and sell your shares after the date you will still receive the dividend for that period. If you want the dividend you need to make sure you purchase the stock at least two business days before the record date.

  4. Payment Date: This is the date the company issues the dividend and shareholders are paid out. Companies can pay dividends on a monthly, quarterly, or annual basis.

How Does the Dividend Affect Share Price?

When a company declares a dividend, the price tends to incorporate that dividend into the stock price. The day of the ex-dividend date is the day when the stock price is affected most by the dividend. Since new buyers of the stock will not receive the dividend the price of the stock typically drops by the dividend amount. This is because the dividend is locked into being received by the shareholders as of the previous market close, instead of the new buyers.

How to Receive your Dividend

To receive a dividend for owning shares of a company you must own the shares before the ex-dividend date. If you plan on buying the stock before the ex-dividend date, ensure you place the buy two business days before the record date so that trades have fully settled.

How are Dividends Taxed?

In the tax world there are two types of dividends: qualified and non-qualified.

Most dividends received will be qualified dividends where they will taxed at capital gain rates and receive preferential tax treatment. However, there are a few instances where dividends can be non-qualified and taxed as ordinary income. Such as the examples below.

  • Dividends paid out by REITs (Real Estate Investment Trusts)

  • Dividends paid on employee stock options

  • Dividends paid by tax exempt organization.

  • Dividends paid out by credit union, loan associations, insurance companies, mutual savings banks

Dividends are a Great Perk for Owning Stocks

Investing in companies that pay a strong dividend can be a good way to receive a return on your investment as they pay out cash on a monthly, quarterly, or annual basis. Keep an eye out for companies where the dividend isn’t sustainable based on profits. Lastly, make sure to know how your dividends are going to be taxed so you don’t have any surprises when tax time comes around.

 
 

 
 
 

Related Articles

Are Series I Bonds right for you to hedge against inflation?
 

There has been a lot of news on high inflation coming and its looming effects on everything from investment portfolios to the price of milk.

As people are searching for ways to combat high inflation and preserve how far their money can go, we’ve been receiving many questions on an investment option called I Bonds. Questions about what they are and why they haven’t heard of them before.

Our hope is to shed some light on Series I Savings Bonds (I Bonds), available here, and outline how the investment works before offering our recommendations.

How risky is an I Bond?

I Bonds are US treasury bonds, meaning they are backed by the full faith and credit of the US government, making them one of the safest, lowest risk investments possible.

What is the interest rate on an I Bond?

There are two parts to the interest rate on an I Bond.

  • A nominal (fixed) rate — currently 0% as of November 2, 2021.

  • An inflation (floating or adjustable) rate that changes every 6 months — currently 3.56% as of November 1, 2021.

These two rates are added together to determine the interest rate on an I Bond, so the current rate on the I Bonds for 6 months is 0% (nominal) + 3.56% (inflation) = 3.56% total (which is 7.12% annually). This interest rate cannot drop below 0% even if there is ever a negative inflation adjustment. See here for historical I Bond interest rates.

The floating rate on I Bonds will adjust as inflation adjusts. Today, inflation rates are high, but as the historical rates table in the link above shows, inflation rates can be lower.

When can I access my money?

An important factor to consider is that I Bonds only pay interest upon maturity, so you will not receive cash flows from the I Bond as you hold it.

I bonds have no secondary market, so you cannot resell your I Bond, you can only redeem it. I Bonds have no liquidity for the first year after purchase, so it’s important that you will not need to access the funds for at least one year. For years 1-5 after purchase, you may redeem your I Bond early by forfeiting the last 3 months of interest. After 5 years, you may redeem the bond early without penalty. I Bonds will mature 30 years after purchase.

How do the taxes work?

I Bonds only pay interest upon maturity. You can claim (pay) the taxes on the earned interest every year on your I Bonds, or you can pay taxes on all interest upon maturity of the I Bond. I Bond interest is not subject to state or local taxes. See here for more information.

How do I purchase I Bonds?

You have to purchase I Bonds directly through treasurydirect.gov, or with your federal income tax refund. See here for more information.

You are limited to $10,000 of I Bonds through electronic purchase, and $5,000 of I Bonds through paper purchase via your tax refund, for a total limit of $15,000 of I Bonds in a calendar year.

The pros and cons of waiting to get paid out

If you’re still wondering if these bonds are right for you and your financial plan, weigh the pros and cons below against your goals.

Pros:

  • The inflation adjustment makes I Bonds a great inflation hedge

Cons:

  • Interest is only paid out upon maturity, so don’t utilize I Bonds as a source of cash flows over time

  • Funds are locked up for 1 year, so don’t use I Bonds for any funds you might need before then

Other considerations:

  • I Bonds must be purchased on your own, so they’re for a more DIY inclined investor

  • The inflation adjustment rate will change adjust over time, so the precise amount of interest an I Bond will earn is uncertain

  • Consider the potential taxes of having all interest hitting upon maturity of the I Bond, or having to pay taxes each year on interest you have not yet received

  • You are limited on how much you can purchase in a year

I Bonds are typically best for medium term (i.e. around 5 year) savings goals.

The inflation adjustment reduces your risk of losing purchasing power due to inflation. The low nominal rates on I Bonds today means your funds will not grow faster than inflation.

For longer term savings goals (i.e. retirement in 10+ years), equities are a great long-term inflation hedge, because companies can adjust their prices (and therefore dividends & earnings) based on inflation. Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) are another, lower risk than equities, investment that adjust for inflation.

If you have more questions about I Bonds, or would like to speak to a financial professional about other investments, please reach out to us at hi@humaninvesting.com or 503-905-3100.

 
 

 
 
 

Related Articles

The Real Risk of Owning Bonds: Too Much in Bonds May Hurt Your Purchasing Power
 

We talk to a lot of different people about investing. A common request is something along the lines of: “I don’t want to lose anything, and I want my money to grow.” This is a challenging, if not impossible mission. The investment world is full of opportunities to grow your money. However, there is an inherent risk when you put your money in any investment.

Finance has a lot of ways of measuring risk. Standard deviation is used to try to show a range of the possible returns. Max drawdown displays your worst-case scenario. Sharpe ratio provides a risk-adjusted measure of performance. However, very few investors ask about standard deviation, max drawdown, and Sharpe ratios. The people we talk to are most likely to ask “What are the odds of losing money” because they don’t want to see their current savings drop in value.

How strong is your purchasing power?

An important consideration when talking about losing money is purchasing power: the ability to buy goods with your money. Inflation has consistently pushed prices up over time, reducing the purchasing power of a single dollar. Wanting to avoid losing money is completely understandable. The danger of keeping your money under your mattress or sitting in cash is that inflation is constantly reducing your purchasing power.

When concerned with losing money, many investors are focused on nominal returns. Nominal returns are the raw return values, unadjusted for inflation, and are simple to calculate and digest. I would argue that most investors should be focused on real returns: returns adjusted for inflation. Real returns are a more accurate measure of your change in purchasing power. Ultimately, very few outside of Scrooge McDuck want a giant pile of money. Most people want to spend that money on goods, like food, travel, or a home, therefore purchasing power is likely what investors really care about.

Real return = (1+Nominal Return) ÷ (1+inflation rate)

Historically, stocks deliver positive returns, and those returns are in your favor. However, stocks are down (i.e. lose money) more frequently than bonds. The safety bonds offer also means they provide lower returns. What blend of stocks and bonds is most likely to protect your purchasing power (i.e. produce a positive real return)?

inflation is dwindling BOND power

To try and answer this question, I looked at the Stocks, Bonds, Bills, and Inflation (SBBI) data from the CFA Institute from 1926-2020. This data included monthly and annual returns; the annual data is for each calendar year. For stocks, I used the Ibbotson SBBI US Large-Cap Stocks total return.

For Bonds, I used the Ibbotson US intermediate-term (5 year) Government Bonds total return. I looked at several different portfolios which include a variety of stocks and bonds. Specifically, I blended the stocks and bonds in 10% increments, from 100% stocks, to 90% stocks 10% bonds, to 80% stocks 20% bonds, and so on to 0% stocks 100% bonds. I also assumed the portfolios were rebalanced at the start of each return period (i.e. the weights were reset at the start of each month for monthly data, and the start of each calendar year for annual data).

I took these different stock/bond portfolio mixes, and I calculated the nominal and real returns from 1926-2020 for both monthly and annual (calendar year) returns. I then calculated what percentage of returns were positive to measure the chance of losing money (nominal returns) or purchasing power (real returns). I’ve graphed the nominal vs real returns for monthly and annual returns below.

bonds-monthly-returns.jpg
bonds-annual-returns-v2.jpg

You’ll notice the nominal monthly returns paint a clear picture. If you want positive nominal returns more often, you want to own more bonds, hence the steady upward trend to the graph. If you look at the annual nominal returns and want to maximize your chances of a positive nominal return, you actually want a 10/90 portfolio (10% stocks, 90% bonds). As risky as stocks seem, having at least a sliver of stocks actually increases the chances of a positive nominal return

The real returns tell a slightly different story. For the monthly real returns, the stock/bond mix is almost irrelevant for producing a positive return, and hovers right around 60%. There is a drop off after 10/90 (10% stocks, 90% bonds), indicating owning even just 10% stocks in your portfolio helps increase your chances of positive real returns better than owning 100% bonds.

For the annual real returns, you can see that your odds of a positive real return are better with at least some bonds in the portfolio. Interestingly, the 70/30 portfolio and the 20/80 portfolios produce the highest chance of a positive real return. The all bond portfolio, 0/100, has the worst chance of maintaining your purchasing power (i.e. producing a positive real return).

Stocks can seem risky, and the loss of value can make many investors shy away. Even just a small amount of stocks can protect your purchasing power better than owning only bonds. There are still many considerations for how you should invest including your risk tolerance, time horizon, and holistic financial plan. If you’re interested in talking to an advisor, please reach out to us at hi@humaninvesting.com or 503-905-3100.

 

 
 

Related articles

The Importance of Portfolio Rebalancing and Market Timing
 
loic-leray-fCzSfVIQlVY-unsplash.jpg

What a season it has been.  I hope and pray that each individual and family member receiving this note is healthy and safe.  My goal over the coming months is to increase the volume of written communication.  These notes will not replace our regular scheduled tax, planning, or portfolio updates.  Instead, they will supplement those conversations and provide a financial perspective that can be communicated efficiently in writing.  The purpose of this note is to discuss our position on market timing and portfolio rebalancing.

Portfolio Rebalancing

We believe that the financial plan is the seminal document for investors seeking to accomplish long term goals. Each financial plan is prescriptive in the amount of saving and portfolio return that is required to accomplish the goals outlined in the plan.  The asset allocation decision is an important one—given it considers risk tolerance, time horizon, and financial goals[1].

The goal of rebalancing is to minimize risk and recalibrate, rather than to maximize return.  The process of rebalancing takes the imbalance that is created by certain asset classes over time and recalibrates those asset classes.  It takes the asset allocation that was originally prescribed by the financial plan and reorients the portfolio to its intended mix of stocks, bonds, and cash.

For most portfolios, recalibration should occur a few times a year.  This is particularly true in retirement accounts, given there is no tax liability for creating gains.  In trust accounts as well as individual and joint accounts, there is a sensitivity to tax gains as a possible consequence of rebalancing.  Every effort is taken to minimize tax liability in those types of accounts.  However, it can be hazardous to let the concern over taxes negate the discipline of regularly rebalancing.  I can think of too many instances where a client avoided rebalancing their account out of concerns for taxes—only to have the market go down. The tax liability for rebalancing was ultimately dwarfed by the loss of principle due to the market decline.  In short, it is rarely advisable to let the tax tail wag the investment dog.

Market Timing

The most common question I receive is, “when should we sell out?”  My typical response is never.  If an investor has a financial plan, which accounts for planning-based return expectations and subsequent asset allocation, the portfolio should always be properly positioned for risk and return.  If the goal of “selling out” is to reduce risk, the action of selling implies the original allocation was incorrect. 

In the past, there have been a few occasions where dramatically reducing risk by selling equities and raising cash makes sense.  Or, to sell a portion of the stock investment and place the proceeds in bonds.  But those reasons have to do with new information about the client situation, which prompt a change in the asset allocation. As an example, years ago, we had a client let us know that their business was struggling, resulting in the potential that their retirement account would need to be tapped for an emergency.  Liquidating equities in their account was a response to a change of plans and circumstances—this is a plan modification and not market timing. 

There is ample research dating back to the 1980s which suggests timing the market[2] or being able to predict the direction of the market is challenging at best[3].  Therefore, we believe in rebalancing “to recapture the portfolio’s original risk-and-return characteristics”[4], and we rely on the financial plan as the authoritative document to prescribe the proper mix of stocks and bonds for each client we serve.


Sources

[1] Zilbering, Y., Jaconetti, C. M., & Kinniry Jr, F. M. (2015). Best practices for portfolio rebalancing. Valley Forge, Pa.: The Vanguard Group. Vanguard Research PO Box2600, 19482-2600.

[2] Brinson, G. P., Hood, L. R., & Beebower, G. L. (1986). Determinants of portfolio performance. Financial Analysts Journal42(4), 39-44.

[3] Butler, A. W., Grullon, G., & Weston, J. P. (2005). Can managers forecast aggregate market returns?. The Journal of Finance60(2), 963-986. 

[4] Zilbering, Y., Jaconetti, C. M., & Kinniry Jr, F. M. (2015). Best practices for portfolio rebalancing. Valley Forge, Pa.: The Vanguard Group. Vanguard Research PO Box2600, 19482-2600.


 

 
 

Related Articles

How to Avoid the Investing Cycle of Emotions
 
alice-donovan-rouse-UweNcthlmDc-unsplash.jpg

Do not let your emotions get in the way of making smart investment decisions.

It is difficult to separate emotions from reality. We often view the world through the lens of whatever emotion we are experiencing, and unchecked emotions can give rise to suboptimal financial decisions.

My role as a financial advisor allows me to have many conversations focused around money. Through these conversations over the last 12 months, I have witnessed the gambit of the emotional response to the stock market and its volatility. What I discovered is that an individual’s emotional response tends to be heightened by three things:

  1. The more zeros at the end of their account balance.

  2. The amount of negative news consumed.

  3. The greatest of which, whether they have taken the time to build a financial plan.

In his book The Behavioral Investor, psychologist and behavioral finance expert, Dr. Daniel Crosby reminds us that our emotions can’t be trusted when it comes to making investment decisions.

“The fact that your brain becomes more risk-seeking in bull markets and more conservative in bear markets means that you are neurologically predisposed to violate the first rule of investing, “buy low and sell high.” Our flawed brain leads us to subjectively experience low levels of risk when risk is actually quite high, a concept that Howard Marks refers to as the “perversity of risk.” – Dr. Daniel Crosby

Like the stock market, our emotions are cyclical. This cycle of emotions experienced as an investor can range from pure euphoria to utter despondency (lack of hope).

Source: Russell Investments

Source: Russell Investments

This emotion is often not dictated by the investor, rather it is the investor’s response to the market. The wild thing is, we have seemingly experienced all of these emotions over the last 12-month period. Compare the cycle of emotion to the S&P 500 over the last year.

S&P 500 1 Year as of 8.19.2020

Is it a coincidence that these two images almost mirror each other? I don’t think so.

It is completely normal to have an emotional reaction to your finances. Your account balances are often in direct relationship to your future financial freedom and well-being. However, it is only when an investor acts on these emotions do they get themselves in trouble.

Investor’s making short term emotional changes to their investments hurt their chances at long-term returns. A study conducted by DALBAR, Inc. discovered that over the last 30 years, the average mutual fund investor underperformed the market by almost 6%! Their finding is that investor’s change investment strategies too often to realize the inherent market rates of return.

Here are some action steps for avoiding emotional investment decisions:

  • Look inward — Take an introspective look to acknowledge your emotional response over the last 12-month market cycle. Will you emotionally make it through another market drop? Right now is the time to build self-awareness, because the reality of the market is not IF it will have another correction, but rather WHEN.

  • Look outward — Do you have someone to help you make wise financial decisions throughout life’s many emotions and seasons? Someone, to stand between your emotions and your finances? This is one of the many ways a financial advisor can add value to your comprehensive financial well-being.

  • Look forward — Does your risk profile align with your financial plan? Are you taking on too much risk (or, too little)? Take some time today to review your holistic investment strategy and consider making any changes while the market has rebounded since its market low on March 23rd.

Our team at Human Investing realizes your family’s financial well-being is just as much “human” as it is “investing”. Let us know how we can help, contact us at Human Investing or call at 503.905.3100.


 

 
 

Related Articles

What is the Secret to Successful Investing?
 
financial-success.png

Through the end of 2019 and dating back 20 years, the S&P 500 returned 6.1%, as described in Table 1 below. During that same time period, a balanced account consisting of 60% stocks and 40% bonds returned 5.6%, while the “average investor” returned just 2.5%.

Table 1

Table 1

The “average investor”, according to JP Morgan and Dallbar, is any investor investing in mutual funds. The report shows the flow of mutual fund buying and selling. The use of mutual funds is the best way to perform a field experiment and infer approximate returns for those buying and selling mutual funds. 

It is implied that those buying mutual funds are more individuals, households, and smaller institutions. Larger institutional clients typically own the investments directly.

So, what’s the deal with the average investor returns?

Why don’t more people invest 100% of their money into the S&P 500 or something similar? The short answer is that while any investor can put their money into the S&P 500, few are able to hold through the ups and downs.

Table 2

Table 2

Looking at Table 2 (using the same 20-year time period), the S&P 500 has seen intra-year drops, that were on average nearly 14%. Investors owning just the S&P 500 would have had to hold tight over those 20 years to achieve the 6.1% return, which is easier said than done. To be sure, there is so much that goes into selecting an allocation for a portfolio. But given the times we are in, I thought it would be useful to lay out a framework for successful investing.

  1. Diversify — In my nearly 24 years of advising clients, I have seen just a few that have been 100% invested in equities. Since 1950, the average all-stock portfolio return was a little over 11%. Interestingly, a 50% stock and 50% bond portfolio for that same period yielded just under 9%. Although an investor may not have the temperament for an all-stock portfolio experience (because of the volatility described in Table 2), they can still save and invest. Through a balanced portfolio, investors can experience a fraction of the expected volatility while still achieving solid returns.

  2. Plan — It baffles me that so many investors focus on the return of the stock market. From my point of view, the only number that should matter is the return an investor needs to achieve their stated goals. Recently, we ran planning calculations for a client that needed 5.5% returns to make all of her financial goals come to fruition. Since working with Human Investing, she has achieved a 6% net return, allowing her to achieve all of her goals. Investors are best off spending time developing a plan and then building a diversified portfolio to achieve those plans. 

  3. Stay in the market — Since your financial plan serves as your road map to achieve your financial goals, it is imperative to stick to the plan. Following the plan means staying invested even when the world appears to be falling apart. But, what if you decide not to follow the plan and get out of the market? It may not be so much about the getting out of the market but about getting back in. Table three describes the negative impact of market timing. Although market timing can be costly, the greater challenge may be the decision on when to get back into the market.

  4. Investing is forever — Successful investors have a forever time frame they measure in a lifetime, not a day. The accelerating adoption of day trading, market timing, and other gambling-like tendencies go against everything I have ever read and learned about successful investing. Take, for example, Warren Buffett, whom many consider the greatest investor of our generation. He has amassed 95% of his wealth after the age of 65. Although I would place Buffett near the top of the list as the greatest investor of our generation, a key contributor to his wealth accumulation has been the length of time he has spent investing. This is a crucial lesson for those who look to get rich quickly and bypass the hard work of saving and investing over a lifetime.

Table 3

Table 3

 

 
 

Related Articles