Four Unique advantages of Social Security
 
blog image.jpg

Social Security is something we contribute to all our working years, so why don’t we know much about it? What sets it apart from other retirement benefits? I want to briefly share some of the characteristics that make Social Security unique and helpful for retirement planning purposes.

Social Security Includes Spousal Benefits

Social Security spousal income is a benefit provided to married couples. If you have a working income that is less than 50% of your spouse’s normal retirement age benefit, a spousal benefit will be added to your Social Security income to make it equal to 50% of your spouse’s income. Even with no working income (homemaker), 50% of the spouse’s normal retirement age income will be received.

To receive this increase in income, the higher-earning spouse must start their benefits before the spousal payments begin. Check your eligibility for spousal benefits here.

Two more things to note:

  • There is no benefit to delaying spousal income after normal retirement age as it does not continue to grow.

  • If the spouse with the higher income predeceases the spouse with the lower income, the surviving spouse will receive the higher of the two incomes for the rest of their life. For example, let’s say Joe has a social security benefit of $2,800 per month, and his wife, Shirley, has a benefit of $1,400 monthly. At Joe’s death, Shirley will receive $2,800 per month rather than $1,400 per month.

Social Security income is not fully taxable

If you are Married Filing Jointly and have a combined income below $25,000 in 2021, you will not owe taxes on social security benefits. If your income is between $25,000 and $34,000 in 2021, 50% of benefits will be subject to taxation. With income over $44,000 in 2021, a maximum of 85% of benefits will be taxable. Social security income is not subject to Oregon state income tax.

Social Security Income varies based on retirement age

You can start taking social security retirement benefits at the age of 62, but if you are able, it is best to delay taking benefits until normal retirement age (typically age 66). Furthermore, delaying benefits until the age of 70 is even more advantageous, as your income will continue to increase by a certain percentage (based on birth year) until then.

Remember: If benefits are claimed before normal retirement age, half of the benefits will be withheld if income is over $18,960. Benefits will be recalculated at normal retirement age, but it is more beneficial to delay taking social security if someone is planning to work. After reaching normal retirement age, unlimited earned income will not reduce your social security income.

Social Security Income is protected from inflation

Each January the IRS/SSA increases benefits by the amount of inflation experienced over the previous year. These cost-of-living adjustments (COLA’s) are credited even when delaying benefits to a later age. The most recent cost of living adjustment was 1.3% in January 2021. The average estimates over a long period of time are 2.6% annually.

Things to note when applying for benefits:

  • Ensure you have Federal withholdings taken from your benefits, often at 12%.

  • Remember, your Medicare Part B premiums ($148.50 per check) will be deducted from your benefit if you are over age 65.

  • Apply online at www.socialsecurity.gov, by phone at (800) 772-1213, or in person at a Social Security office using the office locator. If you have any questions about social security benefits, please schedule a time to chat.

References:

www.ssa.gov

The Baby Boomer’s Guide to Social Security, Elaine Floyd, CFP®

 

Related Articles

Biden's New Tax Proposals and What They Mean For You
 

With each presidential election comes a slew of new tax proposals and changes that are sometimes difficult to decode. News outlets mix proposed and enacted laws, furthering the stress that comes with determining how they will affect your taxes.

The biggest takeaway from Biden's new tax law proposals is that those who earn under $400,000 of income per year should not expect to face an increase in taxes. In fact, they are likely to see more tax credits that will help reduce their tax liability. However, those who make above $400,000 could be significantly affected by several of the proposed tax law changes.

Below is an outline of the administration’s current proposals that may become laws in the coming tax seasons based on your yearly income.

for THOSE WHO MAKE BELOW $400,000

What’s been enacted: The Dependent Care Tax Credit.

Eligible childcare expenses increased from $3,000 to $8,000 ($6,000 to $16,000 for multiple dependents) and the maximum reimbursement rate has increased from 35% to 50% for a maximum credit of $8,000. It is refundable for the 2021 tax year. If you pay for childcare services in 2021 for children 12 and under, you can claim those expenses in tax credits up to $16,000.

blog pic 1.png

The Child Tax Credit has temporarily increased from $2,000 to $3,000 per child ages 6-17, and $3,600 per child aged 0-5 for the 2021 tax year. There will also be monthly payments made from July to December 2021. Half the total credit amount will be paid in advance with the monthly payments, while the other half will be claimed on the tax return that you will file next year. For example, if a single filer with an AGI of $60,000 had one 13-year-old child, they would receive $250 per month from July to December and $1,500 as a credit on their 2021 tax return.

blog pic 2.png

The increase (i.e., the extra $1,000 or $1,600) is gradually phased-out for joint filers with an AGI of $150,000 or more, head-of-household filers with an AGI of $112,500 or more, and all other taxpayers with an AGI of $75,000 or more. At $440,000, couples will phase out of the tax credit entirely.

What’s been proposed: First-Time Homebuyer’s Tax Credit reinstated for up to $15,000 in refundable credits.

You may not have owned a home within the last 3 years to qualify for this credit. You must make no more than 160% of the area median income, and the home’s purchase price must be no more than 110% of the area median purchase price. You could claim this credit for primary residences purchased after Dec. 31, 2020.

for Those Who Make Above $400,000

What’s been proposed: Increased income tax

Currently, the top individual income tax rate is set at 37% on earnings above $622,050 ($518,400 for those filing single). The new proposed rate is 39.6% for earnings above $400,000.

blog pic 3.png

What’s been proposed: The 6.2% Social Security payroll tax on income above $400,000.

For 2021, the maximum limit on earnings for withholding of Social Security tax is $142,800. This proposed tax law would result in the 6.2% tax continuing on earned income over $400,000 in addition to the 6.2% tax on earned income up to $142,800. The income between $142,800 and $400,000 would not be subject to this tax. For example, if $450,000 is earned, $50,000 will be taxed at 6.2% resulting in $3,100 paid in SS tax on top of original cap of $8,853.60.

blog pic 4.png

What’s been proposed: Long-term capital gains and qualified dividends be taxed at a rate of 43.4% on income above $1,000,000.

Long-term capital gains above $501,600 ($445,850 for those filing single) is currently taxed at 20%. In addition, they are proposing the elimination of the step-up in basis for transferred assets.

What’s been proposed: Restoration of the limitation on itemized deductions (ie. mortgage interest, charitable contributions, property taxes, etc.) for taxable income above $400,000.

This means your itemized deduction amount would be reduced by the lesser of 3% of AGI in excess of $400,000 or 80% of your itemized deductions. The state and local tax deduction limit of $10,000 could also be removed, allowing for additional deductions in state and local taxes paid above $10k. For example, a person has $750,000 of taxable income, and their itemized deductions total $75,000. 3% of their taxable income above $400,000 = $10,500, 80% of itemized deductions = 60,000. Since the 3% calculation is the lesser of the two, their itemized deduction amount of $75,000 is then reduced/lowered by $10,500, resulting in $64,500 of itemized deductions.

blog pic 5.png

What’s been proposed: Pass-through deductions removed for taxpayers earning more than $400,000.

For business owners of a Sole Proprietorship, Partnership, S-Corporation, and certain trusts and estates, the Section 199A pass-through deduction for qualified businesses could be up to 20%. The maximum deduction is the lesser of 20% of an owner’s QBI, or 20% of taxable income, excluding any net capital gains. If it were to pass, this deduction would no longer be available if the taxpayers net income were above $400k.

What’s been proposed: Estate and Gift Tax exemption rates for assets may be brought back to 2009 rates.

For 2021, the unified federal gift and estate tax exemption is $11.7 million per individual. The tax rate on cumulative lifetime gifts in excess of the exemption is a flat 40% (applicable to taxable amounts above $1 million made while still alive). The estate tax exemption for Married Filing Jointly (2009): $7,000,000. For those filing Single (2009): $3,500,000. The maximum gift tax rate (2009): 45%

BUSINESS AND CORPORATE TAXATION

What’s been proposed: Increased corporate income tax from 21% to 25-28%.

While this may not directly affect your taxes, it may affect any assets you have in company stocks or potential dividends depending on how the corporation decides to deal with the increase in tax.

What’s been proposed: Minimum tax on corporations with $100 million or more in book income.

Corporations would be taxed on the greater of their regular corporate income tax rate or have a 15% minimum tax imposed on them.

It is important to remember that all proposed tax law changes would need to be reviewed and enacted by Congress in order to become official tax law. All proposed law could potentially be revised or eliminated.

 

 
 
How to Maximize your Nike Stock Options
 

For many years, Stock Options have been a foundational part of compensation for Nike leaders.  They have provided a unique opportunity to build significant wealth by participating in the success of Nike.  While Stock Options can have a great impact on your financial landscape, they can also create considerable confusion. In our experience working with Nike leaders, we have found that there are often misunderstandings about Stock Options and how they differ from actual shares of Nike stock. While we are responsible for the financial planning intricacies for our Nike clients, we wanted to provide a background on Stock Options and share the most important factors to fully maximize them.  

What are Nike Stock Options and how do they work?

Nike Stock options are the right to purchase shares of Nike at a set price (exercise or strike price) that lasts for up to 10 years.  I like to think of them as “coupons”, where you can use your coupon to buy an item for a price that is lower than it is currently worth.  Once you have used your coupon, you could proceed to immediately sell that item for the current price, capitalizing on the difference between the coupon price and the current market value.

Value of Stock Option = # of Options x (Current Stock Price - Exercise Price

To illustrate the difference between stock and Stock Options, it only seemed appropriate to use a shoe analogy.  Imagine you are given access to Limited Release Jordan shoes, and you have two different choices to select from:

nike-stock-choice-1.jpg

So which choice is better for you?  It depends on what happens to the value of those Jordans in the future.  Will the value increase or decrease and by how much?  Do you need another pair of Jordans today? Or can you wait until the future to use them? To better understand how it can all play out, we put the 2 Choices against each other in three head-to-head matchups to determine the winner in each situation.

 

ROUND #1: Value of SHOES drops -10% to $900. 

Shoe Choice: you are still left with shoes that you could sell for $900 or keep if you think the value could recover and grow further.

Coupon Choice: your 10 coupons are worthless since there is no value in purchasing shoes for more than they are worth at $1,000 per pair.

WINNER: Shoe Choice

ROUND #2: Value of shoes increases +10% to $1,100

Shoe Choice: your shoes are now worth $1,100 and the value has increased by $100.  You can sell them or keep them if you think the value could continue to increase further.

Coupon Choice: your coupons would allow you to purchase 10 pairs of shoes for $10,000 (10 coupons x $1,000 per pair).  You could them resell them for $11,000 (10 pairs x $1,100 per pair) and earn a profit of $1,000 ($11,000 value - $10,000 purchase cost).

WINNER: Shoe Choice

ROUND #3: Value of the shoes increases +50% to $1,500

Shoe Choice: your shoes are now worth $1,500 and the value has increased by $500.  You can sell them or keep them if you think the value could continue to increase further.

Coupon Choice: your coupons would allow you to purchase 10 pairs of shoes for $10,000 (10 coupons x $100 per pair).  You could them resell them for $15,000 (10 pairs x $1,500 per pair) and earn a profit of $5,000 ($15,000 value - $10,000 purchase cost).

WINNER: Coupon Choice

 

THE POST MATCH ANALYSIS

nike-scorecard.jpg

Round #1: Shoe Choice (Nike Stock) won and underscores the risk of Stock Options and how the value can become $0 if the stock price does not increase. 

Round #2: Shoe Choice (Nike Stock) won but only by a small amount.  Even if the stock grows, low growth still favors Nike Stock over Stock Options. This is common if Stock Options are held for a short period of time. 

Round #3: Coupon Choice (Stock Options) won by a significant amount.  Substantial growth in Nike stock will favor Stock Options by a wide margin. 

UNDERSTANDING THE OPPORTUNITY AND RISK

The Shoe & Coupon Choices shows how the Stock Options can perform from the beginning, but what about Stock Options that you already own and have existing value?  At Human Investing, we created a Stock Option Volatility Analysis to show what the upside and downside volatility can be like for existing Stock Options.

nike-volatility.jpg

If you examine the outlined bars, you will note that a 15% increase in Nike Stock price would result in a 101% increase in the value of that Stock Option. At the same time, a 15% decrease would drop this Stock Option value by -101%.  The owner of Nike Stock Options should be prepared and ready to experience significant short-term declines like the ones shown in the chart above.

The key to capturing the upside potential of Nike Stock Options is having a long enough time horizon.  Stock prices can quickly move up and down in the short-term but have a history of growth over the long-term (10+ years).  If you own Stock Options and can wait long enough before you exercise and sell them, that will give you the best probability of maximizing the value.

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU LEAVE NIKE?

Since a longer time horizon is one of the most important components for success with Stock Options, what can disrupt that opportunity?

If you leave (voluntarily or involuntarily) Nike, you typically have up to 90 days to exercise your vested stock options and all unvested stock options are forfeited.  While it is uncommon, there have been some exceptions where the 90-day time period is extended.

In addition, if you meet specific “retirement” criteria, you can receive more favorable vesting for your unvested options.  There are two “retirement” benefits that are unique to Nike stock options:

1) Early Retirement: Age 55-59 with 5 years of Service

  • Unvested Stock Options (less than one year prior to separation) will be forfeited. 

  • All other unvested Stock Options will continue per the original vesting schedule.

  • After your retirement date, you will have up to 4 years to exercise your options. 

2) Normal Retirement: Age 60+ with 5 years of Service

  • Unvested Stock Options (less than one year prior to separation) will be forfeited. 

  • All other unvested Stock Options will become fully vested as of the retirement date.

  • After your retirement date, you will have up to 4 years to exercise your options.

The special retirement vesting options described above can be an extremely valuable benefit to plan for and take advantage of if you are close to or at age 55+.

HOW ARE STOCK OPTIONS TAXED?

As Stock Options vest and grow in value, there is no tax along the way.  Tax is only recognized when you exercise your options.  The dollars are taxed in the same way as your salary, at ordinary income tax rates, which can be as high as 55.45% since it includes federal, state, Social Security, and Medicare taxes.  This can push you into a higher income tax bracket and often disrupts your tax liability if not adequately planned for throughout the year. 

TAX & PLANNING STRATEGIES

Strategy #1 – Spread Option Exercises Over Multiple Years

Since exercising Stock Options creates additional taxable income, carefully exercising the right amount and dividing it over more than one year can help you lower your overall taxes. 

For example, assume you have taxable income is $450,000 and have $350,000 of Stock Options that you want to exercise. Your current income of $450,000 would be in the 35% tax bracket (2021) and you will not move up to the 37% tax bracket until your income exceeds $628,301 (2021).  That leaves room for $178,301 worth of stock exercises that would be taxed at 35% before it reaches the 37% bracket.  If you spread the $350,000 of exercises over two years ($175,000 per year) instead of exercising the entire amount in one year, you could avoid the 37% bracket and save about $3,500 in Federal taxes.

Strategy #2 – Coordinate Option Exercises with the Nike Deferred Compensation Plan

Another strategy is to coordinate the timing of your Stock Option exercise with the contribution of a similar amount of salary and/or bonus into the Nike Deferred Compensation plan.  This strategy requires the following steps:

  • Step 1: Determine the amount of Stock Options you wish to exercise. As an example, we picked $300,000 of stock options to exercise.

  • Step 2: Elect to defer the same amount ($300,000) into the Nike Deferred Compensation plan from your salary during Open Enrollment.

  • Step 3: Exercise and sell $300,000 of Stock Options in the same tax year as you are contributing $300,000 to the Nike Deferred Compensation Plan

  • Step 4: Use the proceeds from the $300,000 of Stock Option exercises to replace your salary and support your living needs.
    In the end, you would have essentially funneled your Stock Option proceeds into the Deferred Compensation plan and avoided paying any additional taxes. 

Learn more about the Nike Deferred Compensation Plan.   

Nike stock options are an incredible opportunity

Although Nike Stock Options are often misunderstood, they can provide an incredible opportunity to generate wealth.  To really maximize of the opportunity, we recommend that you are prepared to navigate the volatility, complexities, and tax strategy. 

If you have any questions or want to know more about how to handle your Nike Stock Options, please get in touch.

You can schedule time with me on Calendly below, e-mail me at marc@humanvesting.com, or call or text me at (503) 608-2968.

 

 
 

Related Articles

What Individual Companies are Inside my Target Retirement Funds?
 

When you pull back the curtain to see what is inside a target-date fund, there are thousands of individual companies. To help visualize some of the top holdings, we created a graph that illustrates the Vanguard Target Retirement 2045 Fund (VTIVX).

Vanguard Index v2 - 2021-01.jpg

Over time, target-date funds adjust their holdings and asset allocation (stocks/bonds/cash) based on your retirement age. But for now, we hope this snapshot clarifies some of the largest companies inside the Vanguard Target Retirement 2045 Fund. 

 

 
 
Human Investing
Kickstarting Your Financial Plan
 
unsplash-image-PVIbUkN_wCQ.jpg

Not sure what questions to ask when you meet with an advisor?

Here are six questions we commonly get asked with some advice from our team.

1. I want to support my child through college. When should I start saving?

The earlier you save, the more time your money has to grow.

rivermark-01.jpg

The benefits of saving early are dramatic, but there's still value in starting now—even if your child is in high school. The dollars you save will not have as much time to grow, but they are dollars you will not be borrowing. You’ll also be in a better situation if you choose an account that gives you tax benefits, such as immediate tax deductions or tax-free withdrawals.

Still not sure if saving for college is right for you? Check out this article by Peter Fisher, co-founder and managing partner of Human Investing.

2. Should I spend my cash paying off high interest loans, or invest it?

Historically, the average rate of return for stock market investments is approximately 10%, while on average, the APR on credit cards has been hovering just above 20%. So, if you are investing when you have credit card debt, you are likely paying a higher interest rate on your debt than you are earning via your investments. Unless you have a huge amount in investments, you end up losing money overall.

3. When do I start saving for retirement?

Again, start saving as early as possible to give your money maximum time to grow. Depending on your employer, you may already have some form of retirement benefits accruing. There are various ways of saving for retirement, including employer sponsored plans like 401(k) and 457b plans, or personal retirement savings like Roth and Traditional IRA’s. A mix of the two is the best way to ensure ample savings for retirement, but deciding which is best for you requires some analysis of your current and expected employment and income status.

4. Is my investment portfolio right for me?

As you age and get closer to retirement, you want to make sure the risk level of your investment portfolio is balanced to match your growth and maintenance needs. While having all of your investments allocated in the stock market may result in a high return on investment, it can also result in high losses. This can be catastrophic for a person planning on retiring soon. On the other hand, if a young person has a few decades before they are planning to retire, but they are only investing their money in bonds, they are losing out on the potential growth of higher risk investment options.

 Investment in both bonds and stocks allows for a mix of potential income and growth, and the best fitting ratio is different for everyone. Reach out to us to speak with our retirement planning team to discuss your current allocations. We care here to help better prepare you for a comfortable retirement.

5. What should my emergency savings look like?

The most common numbers suggested for an emergency fund is 3-6 months’ worth of your current living expenses. These include expenses such as housing, food, healthcare, debts, and so on. You do not need to include things like entertainment, nonessential shopping, or vacation expenses. If you are, you have too much going into your emergency savings fund that could be invested elsewhere. Below is a chart showing example savings amounts and how they compound over the course of two years.  

6. When should I begin utilizing expert tax services?

You may be at a point where using your preferred e-file service to do your taxes is still getting the job done just fine, but at what point do they get too complicated for you to be doing them on your own? Once you begin to deal with things like property taxes, retirement plans, and investments, it may be best to have an expert handle the numbers for you.

Luke Schultz, the Director of Tax at Human Investing, has over 12 years of experience in the areas of tax compliance and planning. With a heavy focus on planning, he spends much of his time working closely with individuals, putting emphasis on proactive planning to help clients make the best decisions for them and their families.

Want to get started?

Schedule an appointment with an advisor here or feel free to call us at 503-905-3108.

Sources:
Vanguard, When should you start saving for college?
The Balance, Rule of Thumb: Should I Pay Off Debt or Invest?
Money Under 30, Should You Pay Off Student Loans Early?

 

Related Articles

Charts of Q1 2021
 

The start to 2021 was eventful for our team at Human Investing. Since the beginning of January, we watched the markets and headlines respond to the capital siege, the GameStop phenomenon, and another stimulus bill. Now that Q1 2021 is over, our team is sharing five of our favorite charts we have seen circulate this quarter.  Enjoy!  

Chart 1: Gamestop

January 2021 was the GameStop month. Even though it seems like this frenzy is over, we expect the GameStop phenomenon to remain relevant in the months and years to come. We are sharing a simple chart that captures both the price spike and trading volume spike.

While there are many takeaways from this short squeeze, one important reminder is to always keep your investment strategy the forefront of your decision-making. When will you be spending your dollars? What will the dollars be spent on? Remember that both your savings and your investment strategies are likely different from your neighbors, your headlines, and your influencers.  

chart-01.jpg

Chart 2: Bull Markets

This chart highlights the annualized returns of recent bull markets.  As illustrated at the bottom, 2020 was an extraordinary year for market returns with an annualized return of 79.4%. This annualized return was not predictable, but it shows the importance of staying invested during a market downturn.

What does this mean for you? Do not take your investment returns this past year for granted! If you have created an investment strategy, stick to your game-plan. Past results do not guarantee similar future returns.

Chart 3: Price Changes

If you attended one of our group presentations recently, then you may have already seen this inflation chart. As illustrated in this chart, we want to emphasize that hospital services and college tuition are 165% more expensive today than in the year 2000. Let this chart be a reminder to plan for these big expenditures. Also, next time you watch TV – give it some appreciation. TV’s are a prime example of a technology that has not only gotten smarter and faster, but also more affordable over the years.

Chart 4: U.S. Savings Rate

This chart visualizes the U.S. Savings Rate before the pandemic, during the height of the pandemic, and the savings rate five months after the stay-at-home orders were released in the US. Notice that the precautionary savings increased significantly in April and May 2020, but has decreased ever since?  We encourage you to review your precautionary or “emergency savings” and to contact our team to strategize ways to make it happen.

chart-04.jpg

Chart 5: Home Sales

As Portland residents, we know how difficult it is to buy a home here. According to Redfin, the median sale price in Portland is up 22.4% year-over-year and the median days on the market is down 67.5%. While this may be a favorable scenario for current home sellers, it is obviously a distressing situation for home buyers. We recommend reading the New York Times article for a full analysis on the national housing inventory and reasons why the number of homes for sale has plummeted.

That concludes our Q1 2021 Charts post. We promise to post our favorite charts from Q2 2021 this summer!  

 

 
signature-HI Team.png
 

Related Articles

ChartsHuman Investing
Hoping for a Nike Stock Split? Why a Stock Split should not change your investment strategy.
 

The recent success of Nike stock has begun to fuel questions and curiosity about a future stock split.   When a company like Nike announces a stock split, does it lead to an immediate increase in value?  For many investors, stock splits tend to generate enthusiasm and an expectation that the stock will experience significant growth but is that always the case?  We will review what a stock split is and why companies have them.  Applying it specifically to Nike, we will explore the history of Nike stock splits and how the stock performed after those splits occurred.  

What is a Stock Split? 

A stock split happens when a company divides its outstanding shares into multiple shares, increasing the overall number of shares.  Since the underlying value of the company does not change, this results in a lower price per share.  For example, if you own 50 shares of Nike and the stock price was $100/share, your total value would be $5,000.  If Nike completed a 2-for-1 stock split, you would then own 100 shares with a stock price of $50/share, resulting in the same $5,000 total value.   

Why Do Companies do Stock Splits? could it increase the value of the stock?  

Companies have historically performed stock splits to make the stock more liquid and accessible to owners.  Stock splits typically occur after a company has experienced significant growth and the higher price may become a barrier to the average investor.  In the example above, you would need $100 to purchase one share of Nike before the stock split.  After the 2-for-1 stock split, you would only need $50 to purchase a share of Nike.

In theory, a stock split should not change your total dollar value in the stock.  However, the announcement of a stock split can create renewed interest and availability in the stock, which can result in a temporary price increase.  How has the announcement of a stock split affected Nike stock historically?   

History of Nike Stock Splits

Nike has performed a 2-FOR-1 stock split seven times in its history, with the first one occurring in 1983 and the most recent one occurring in 2015.  We examined the performance of Nike stock compared to the S&P 500 Index (benchmark for US Large Cap Stock Market) both 1 week and 1 year after the announcement of the last four stock splits in 1996, 2007, 2012 and 2015.

nike-split-01.jpg
nike-split-02.jpg

Observations of Last Four Nike Stock Splits

When observing the outcomes of the last four Nike stock splits, several points stand out.

  1. Initial Price Bump for Nike – In all four cases, there was a solid price increase over a 1-week period after the announcement ranging from 2.5%-6.64%.  This price bump was much higher compared to the S&P 500 performance over that same period.  This is not surprising as a stock split announcement tends to garner interest and is considered favorable for the company.

  2. Lack of Consistency – When you look at the 1-Year return numbers for Nike, there is much more variability in the outcomes.  Although one might assume that there would be positive 1-year performance each time, the stock price was in fact negative in 2 of the 4 years. 

  3. Nike and the S&P 500 were Not on the Same Page – When comparing the 1-year performance between Nike and the S&P 500, in all four instances, the variation in returns was significant and had an average return difference of 34.46%.  For example, in 2012, Nike was up +75.73% versus S&P 500 at +35.21% (40.52% difference) and in 1996 Nike was down -8.55% and S&P 500 was up +35.35% (46.90% difference).

nike-split-03.jpg
nike-split-04.jpg

our recommendation for nike employees

During any short period of time, stock prices can move unpredictably and an event like a stock split does not necessarily result in substantial growth.  Stock splits do not fundamentally create any additional value and as you can see by the last four Nike splits, the results are inconsistent. The historical performance shows that any initial price increases from the split tend to be temporary.  We recommend that owners of Nike stock view their investment as long-term (10+ years), which will provide the best opportunity for success regardless of whether the stock undergoes a split or not.

If you have questions about your Nike stock and how it applies to your situation, please get in touch.

You can schedule time with me on Calendly, e-mail me at marc@humanvesting.com, or call or text me at (503) 608-2968.   

 

 
 

Related Articles

Combating the investing FOMO (and FOBI) in all of us
 

In a recent interview Jason Zweig, a personal finance columnist for the WSJ, had a quote that resonated with me.   

  "Emotional discipline is the single hardest thing about the investment game."   

After accumulating over 30 years of writing and thinking about investing and personal finance, Jason points to emotion (not market valuations, stock picking, or market corrections) as the most difficult part of investing.  As financial advisors, we witness the struggle of emotional discipline firsthand. Recent news (and noise) around tech stocks, housing prices, federal spending, cryptocurrencies, inflation, and interest rates have made it more difficult for investors to maintain this discipline.  

are you an investor facing FOMO or FOBI?  

This lack of emotional discipline manifests itself typically in one of two ways:   

  1. Fear of Missing Out (FOMO) in the market. If you are 15 years old, FOMO is seeing your friends doing something without you on social media. If you are an investor, FOMO is the internal dialogue of “I see my neighbor making money on ____, I need to buy ___.” Someone who has FOMO tends to follow the crowds. FOMO can lead an investor to think their rate of return is a benchmark for their success rather than achieving a return needed for a successful financial plan.

  2. Fear of Being In (FOBI) the market. FOBI is the internal dialogue of “I have seen how this story ends. I need to sell ____.” Someone who has FOBI likely listens to news sources who make a profit off pessimistic news. Note: It is easy to push the sell button, it is always harder to get back in.  

FOMO and FOBI may seem different, however, both are ultimately trying to guess where the market will go next and are speculative in nature. Let 2020 be a great reminder that it’s difficult to predict how the market or a particular investment will do year to year.  

Periodic Table of Investment Returns from the last 20 years

One of my favorite charts to illustrate the difficulty to predict short-term performance is "The Periodic Table of Investment Returns". This graph ranks the annual returns of popular asset classes from best to worst over the last 20 years.   

Source: Blackrock; Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The information provided is for illustrative purposes and is not meant to represent the performance of any particular investment. Assumes reinvestment of all distributions. It is…

Source: Blackrock; Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The information provided is for illustrative purposes and is not meant to represent the performance of any particular investment. Assumes reinvestment of all distributions. It is not possible to directly invest in an index. Diversification does not guarantee a profit or protect against loss.

An investor experiencing FOMO is likely paying attention to the top row, the best-returning asset classes over the last 20 years. This investor is likely trying to guess what will be the highest performing asset class in the coming year.  

Meanwhile, an investor experiencing FOBI is likely paying closer attention to the bottom rows, with a specific focus on larger market selloffs like 2001, 2002, and 2008. A FOBI investor is worried about being invested in the wrong asset class and will try to avoid the worst-performing asset class in the coming year.  

The Periodic Table of Investment Returns reminds me of three investing truths:   

  1. It can be dangerous to try and guess what is next. Consider US small-cap stocks (Sm Cap – in light green), which had the highest average annual return over the 20 years. While small-cap stocks were the best performer they also showed the widest variance in outcomes. Guessing right in 2003 would have provided a positive return of 47.3%. Guessing wrong in 2008 would have provided a negative return of 33.8%. 

  2. Past performance is not an indicator of future returns. Making investment decisions based on recent performance (e.g., looking at 1, 3, and 5-year returns) can be detrimental to an investment portfolio.  International’s performance as a prime example (Int’l – in yellow), over the five years from 2003-2007 international was the best performing asset class by a long shot. International seemed like the sure thing. Unfortunately, the investors who followed international’s high returns were greeted with a brutal 43% selloff in 2008.   

  3. Portfolio diversification is the answer to combating FOMO and FOBI – See “Div portfolio” in purple along the middle rows.  Diversification is an investment strategy that aims to maximize a level of return for the risk desired. Diversification accomplishes this by strategically spreading money across different types of investments.   

 A diversified portfolio helps investors maintain emotional discipline. Diversification can avoid the fear of missing out on the next hot investment. Owning more of the market will naturally provide more opportunities to not miss out on the growth of specific sectors or individual investments. Diversification can also temper being fearful of being in the market and owning the next big loser. Diversification disperses your dollars across many asset classes, which means if one company is a dud it will not sink the ship.  

If you struggle with emotional discipline when investing, congratulations you are a human. If helpful, please use The Periodic Table of Investment Returns as a great reminder that emotional discipline is difficult. Putting a plan in place along with proper diversification can help investors make smart long-term decisions.

 

 
 

Related Articles

Hello Speculation, My Old Friend
 

The term speculation[1] has been on the steady decline since 1840. The decline in use is somewhat surprising given the current market environment where speculation runs rampant. In recent weeks, our team inked a well-thought-out article about the speculation du jour titled, The Big Short: Volume II Starring $GME . Interestingly, they could have been writing about any of the past's speculations—like the Dutch Tulipmania in the 1630s and the roaring 20s that ran up to the 1929 crash. More recently, tech stock speculation reached a fevered pitch in the 2000s and was followed by an equally thrilling run-up in housing which peaked in Q1 2007.

“Speculation is easy to spot, but it is difficult to understand what brings speculative environments to an end.”

Memory Lane (1995-2000)

Speculation in technology stocks lasted for six years. Money managers and even the Federal Reserve Board Chairman Alan Greenspan noted the overall frothiness of the markets. In his 1996 public address, Chairman Greenspan pondered, "but how do we know when irrational exuberance has unduly escalated asset values…?" From 1995 to 2000, the Nasdaq grew sixfold (see Figure 1 below). Over several years, beginning in March of 2000, the tech-heavy Nasdaq stock index lost nearly 80% of its value. Even the "blue chip" tech stocks of the day: Cisco, Intel, and Oracle, fell fast. But because they had well established and viable business', they crawled from the rubble and thrived. But the road to recovery took 15 years as the Nasdaq crossed through its previous market peak set in March of 2000 in April of 2015.

Figure 1

Figure 1

Reason for the speculation?

As was the case leading up to the peak of the .com era, much of today's speculation has been brought about by venture capital (VC) investment. Key statistics surrounding VC investment are at or near all-time highs. This includes deal activity, VC-backed IPO's, and VC-backed M & A. You can learn more about VCs and speculation here. The influence of M & A on the market dynamics is meaningful—particularly for retail investors who see what VCs are doing and want a piece of the action. In the book, The Psychology of Money, the author notes that "people have a tendency to be influenced by the actions of other people who are playing a different financial game than they are." VC investors are some of the most sophisticated investors in the world.  Simply put, VC investors are playing a different financial game than most people who want to get a piece of their action.

One reason for concern is that a mass of money is being put into the capital markets, including VCs, with a speculative bent. This changes the market's disposition. The stock market can quickly turn from a place to save for retirement and invest for college to a casino or dog track, where a quick buck can be made. The bottom line is that investing and speculating are not the same thing. In the last 25 years, the most successful investors I have observed have relied on simple truths to accumulate their wealth. They make their money by saving and investing over a lifetime. To be sure, some speculators hit it big, and those will be the stories you hear about. Others, as is the case with most speculative investments, will lose everything.

Access, Gamification, and Human Nature

This go-around, the rise of speculative investing seems to have a social appeal. With stock trading commissions at zero and gamified investment platforms, both access and the fun factor are present at levels I've never seen before. On the one hand, I'm thrilled that more people are interested in the capital markets. But I wonder if tools and access make investing more like a casino or betting app than serious investors' tools to achieve lifelong financial goals. If investing is being marketed to fulfill all your dreams in a couple of keystrokes, why wait a lifetime?

It is human nature to want a piece of what is working—after all, who wouldn't?  We all know someone who made their money quickly. For every person who made an easy buck and won the lottery, millions of us are going to need to do it the hard way. Yes, the wet blanket approach to investing—like spending less than what you earn and putting a little away each month to an emergency fund. Forgoing a slice of your paycheck today so that you have something to live off when you are no longer generating an income from your labor. Driving the same old car so the payments you would otherwise have with a new car can go to your child's college savings account. I know what some of you may be saying, "he just doesn't get it." Maybe not, but what is true is that if investors do not choose a path, it will be selected for them. Or if not, they may bounce around from one path to another, making for a very emotional and disjointed investing experience. One path has a high probability of success because it relies on disciplined saving and investing behavior over a lifetime. The other approach is speculative, looks fun, is incredible to talk about, and has social equity—but unfortunately has a fractional probability of success.

Tesla and bubbles

There are plenty of speculative investments that will make an article like this seem out of touch and tired. Maybe so. Take the electric car manufacturer who recently booked its first full year of profits. Yep, the investor and media darling Tesla is worth $800 billion and just turned a profit in 2020 for the first time since it was founded in 2003. The only issue is that it is not from selling cars. The bulk of their profit comes from selling regulatory tax credits, not from selling cars. Read more about Tesla here. This is fine, and I own a few Tesla shares inside my low-cost Vanguard S&P 500 index fund. The point in sharing a story about Tesla is not to shame those that own the stock, nor is it a knock on the product as they make a good car. Instead, it highlights the influence of VC money and corresponding expectation for speculative investing and returns.

Dr. Olivier Blanchard, the most cited economist in the world, penned a 1979 masterpiece where he said this,

"Self-ending speculative bubbles, i.e., speculative bubbles followed by market crashes, are consistent with the assumptions of rational expectations. More generally, speculative bubbles may take all kinds of shapes. Detecting their presence or rejecting their existence is likely to prove very hard."

If speculation were a person, I would write it a letter. It would be short. It would go like this, "As for our families and how we advise Human Investing clients, we view each dollar as hard earned and essential to a well thought out financial plan. There is no play money or money we can afford to lose. As such, we are not much for speculation." Sincerely, your wet blanket.

[1] Merriam-Webster defines speculation as “a risky undertaking.” Thesaurus notes it is a “theory, guess, risk, or gamble.”

 

 
 

Related Articles

The 3 Questions to Ask to Build a Solid Retirement Income Plan
 

Saving for retirement can seem straightforward compared to the daunting task of converting your hard-earned savings into retirement income.

When building a retirement income plan knowing what questions to ask will potentially save you money, lower your overall tax bill, and provide you peace of mind. Here are three questions you should ask when building a retirement income plan, as well as some considerations:

Question 1: What sources are available to you?

There are many ways to fund retirement. Thus, no retirement plan looks the same. To begin to understand how you will fund retirement, give yourself a quick assessment. What sources are available to you and how much?

retirement-income-01 copy.jpg

What you should consider: Simplicity in retirement. This can be achieved by consolidating retirement accounts such as your employer-sponsored retirement plans into an IRA. See - Why an IRA makes more sense in retirement than your 401(k)

Question 2: When do you plan on receiving income from your different sources?

There are a lot of unique planning opportunities regarding when to start receiving your sources of income. Knowing when to access these different sources can provide efficiency, lower taxes paid, and increase your retirement income.

 The IRS and Social Security Administration have imposed rules that coincide with specific ages. Familiarizing yourself with these key rules and ages associated with accessing popular income sources can help you begin to answer the question of “When?”. Here are some key ages to consider when building a retirement income plan around these popular sources -

Tax-deferred accounts (401(k)/403(b)/IRAs):

  • Age 59.5 - you can’t access tax-deferred dollars without a 10% early withdrawal penalty before age 59.5. The IRS does highlight some exceptions to the 10% penalty for premature withdrawals.

  • Age 72 (or age 70.5 if you were born before 1951) – The IRS requires that an individual withdraws a minimum amount of their retirement plans (i.e. an IRA) each year starting in the year they reach age 72. This requirement is known as a required minimum distribution or an RMD. Account-holders that do not take their full RMD will be faced with a stiff excise tax equal to 50% of the RMD not withdrawn.

Social Security:

Most Americans can begin claiming Social Security retirement benefits as early as age 62, or as late as age 70. Once you stop working, it can be tempting to claim Social Security as soon as possible to subsidize your income. However, it’s often strategic to delay Social Security as long as possible. The longer you delay claiming your Social Security benefit the greater your guaranteed inflation-adjusted monthly benefit will grow (up to age 70). Factors that should be considered when creating a plan around Social Security are life expectancy, other sources of retirement income, and spousal benefits.

retirement-income-02 copy.jpg

What you should consider:

  • Which sources you will draw first?

  • Should you delay social security as long as possible?

  • How long each source will last?

Question 3: What are the tax implications of accessing your retirement income sources?

Not all income sources are taxed at the same rate. Take the time to understand your applicable taxes and build a tax-sensitive retirement income plan to prevent paying unnecessary amounts to the government.

retirement-income-03.jpg

What you should consider:

  • The tax implications of the aforementioned RMD’s. RMD’s can unknowingly force you to pay a higher than necessary tax bill once you are forced to take required withdrawals.

  • A tax bracket optimization strategy that provides savings on your overall retirement tax bill. This can be especially beneficial in the early years of retirement. Learn more about Tax Bracket Optimization here.

The misfortune of not having a retirement income strategy.

Heading into retirement without an income strategy is financially precarious. To illustrate the benefit of creating an effective plan, we are sharing a hypothetical example.  Meet Charlie and Frankie:

  • Charlie (age 61) and Frankie (age 60) live in Oregon and each plan to retire when they turn age 62.

  • Charlie has $1,000,000 in a 401k/traditional IRA.

  • Frankie has $250,000 in a 401k/traditional IRA.

  • They have $150,000 in joint accounts.

  • At age 67 Charlie and Frankie are eligible to receive $2,990/month and $2,376/month, respectively.

  • Their annual income goal during retirement is $90,000.

In the following charts, we compare the impact of an efficient retirement income strategy to one that is not. The only thing that is different in the two scenarios is the consideration of when to draw specific sources and the associated tax implications. Unfortunately, when managed inefficiently the couple is only able to maintain their target annual income for 26 years. Additionally, the inefficient strategy forces the couple to pay an additional $129,000 tax over 30 years when compared to a more efficient strategy.

 
inefficient-retirement-income.jpg
efficient-retirement-income.jpg
 

Assumptions: 4% investment rate of return on all accounts. No additional contributions are made to investment accounts. Taxes include both Federal and Oregon State income tax.

This is one of the most important financial decisions you can make.

Taking the time to thoroughly answer these questions can provide long-term value.

Engaging with a financial planning firm can be helpful if you are not fully confident in making a retirement income plan. Working with the right financial planning firm for your unique situation can be the difference between a carefree retirement and a stressful one. To learn more about how we think about serving clients through comprehensive financial planning, check out our services here.

 

 
 

Related Articles